男友太凶猛1v1高h,大地资源在线资源免费观看 ,人妻少妇精品视频二区,极度sm残忍bdsm变态

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / center

Procedures for online litigation to be clarified

By CAO YIN | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2020-09-23 23:19
Share
Share - WeChat
[Photo/VCG]

A judicial interpretation for online litigation is expected to be issued within the end of this year in a move to regulate legal behavior of courts in cyberspace, an official from China's top court said.

After seeing achievements by three internet courts and based on their legal practice in the past few years, "we'll further clarify legal procedures of dealing with online litigation, preparing to issue an interpretation that applies to all Chinese courts before the end of this year," said Li Shaoping, vice-president of the Supreme People's Court.

He made the remark at a seminar on developments of the internet courts in Beijing on Wednesday, noting some rules relating to online litigation, including technological standards and data security, will also be studied and made.

"Meanwhile, we plan to guide the internet courts to strengthen communication with government agencies and internet enterprises as well as to build a data sharing platform," he added.

With fast development of the internet and technology, China established its first court to handle internet-related disputes in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, in August 2017. A year later, two other such courts were set up in Beijing and Guangzhou, Guangdong province.

All legal procedures, including case filing, trial and ruling delivery, can be done online in these courts, and disputes heard in the courts mainly cover internet and intellectual property rights, such as those involving online loans, online shopping contracts and online copyrights issues.

By Aug 31, the three courts had heard 222,473 cases, of which, 194,697 were concluded. More than 99 percent of such cases were filed and heard online, statistics released by the top court on Wednesday said, adding each hearing lasts 29 minutes on average, saving much more time than litigation offline.

While improving judicial efficiency, simplifying legal process and offering convenience for litigants, the three courts have also played a bigger role in exploring how to regulate internet behavior by hearing cases and how to govern cyberspace by rule of law, the top court said in a statement.

For example, Beijing Internet Court, resolved a dispute over unpaid fees for faking online views last year. In the ruling, it clarified such behavior a fraud, misleading users, damaging public interests and bringing disorder to the online business environment. 

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 嘉定区| 宜州市| 麻栗坡县| 房产| 罗甸县| 洛阳市| 金川县| 搜索| 海林市| 宜章县| 蓬安县| 米易县| 富顺县| 汝州市| 舒兰市| 招远市| 黄骅市| 大兴区| 孝昌县| 连南| 灌云县| 沐川县| 金湖县| 吉隆县| 渝北区| 当涂县| 巨鹿县| 修文县| 二连浩特市| 达州市| 衡东县| 长兴县| 岫岩| 荆州市| 河北区| 荣成市| 巴林右旗| 岚皋县| 山东省| 乌鲁木齐市| 乐至县|