男友太凶猛1v1高h,大地资源在线资源免费观看 ,人妻少妇精品视频二区,极度sm残忍bdsm变态

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Chinese Perspectives

Analyzing the illegality and invalidity of the South China Sea Arbitration Awards via six 'whys'

Keynote Speech at the Symposium on "South China Sea Arbitration Awards and International Law"

By Ma Xinmin | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2024-04-30 09:34
Share
Share - WeChat

II. Why is it argued that the arbitral tribunal contravened the law?

The arbitral tribunal disregarded the rules of international law and rendered unlawful decisions, seriously undermining the international rule of law. This is chiefly manifested in six aspects:

First, the arbitral tribunal disregarded the fact that general international law can serve as the legal basis for maritime claims. The preamble of the Convention explicitly states that "matters not regulated by the Convention continue to be governed by the rules and principles of general international law."

Second, the arbitral tribunal disregarded the relationship between the Convention and general international law as outlined in the Convention itself. Although the arbitral tribunal cited Articles 311 and 293 of the Convention to argue that the Convention takes precedence over rules of general international law, Article 311 solely addresses the relationship between the Convention and other treaties, while Article 293 concerns the application of law, neither addressing the Convention's relationship with general international law.

Third, the arbitral tribunal disregarded the well-established rules pertaining to historic rights in general international law.

Fourth, the arbitral tribunal disregarded the long-established régime of continental States' outlying archipelagos in general international law.

Fifth, the arbitral tribunal disregarded the explicit provisions of Article 121 of the Convention and manipulated its wording.

Sixth, the arbitral tribunal disregarded due process and the rule of evidence, such as acting contrary to basic burden of proof requirements, deliberately lowering the standard of proof for the Philippines, making determinations based upon irrelevant, immaterial, or non-probative evidence, and making subjective assumptions about the facts.

|<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next   >>|
Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 永清县| 大荔县| 泾川县| 大丰市| 宁陵县| 桐乡市| 朔州市| 崇文区| 罗城| 佛山市| 馆陶县| 崇左市| 乌兰察布市| 兴宁市| 柏乡县| 广丰县| 迭部县| 绩溪县| 哈尔滨市| 汉中市| 汪清县| 分宜县| 社旗县| 武陟县| 镇康县| 昌黎县| 阜新市| 苏州市| 乐平市| 高唐县| 长沙市| 崇州市| 大竹县| 蒲城县| 教育| 正安县| 育儿| 和硕县| 佛坪县| 新田县| 尉氏县|