男友太凶猛1v1高h,大地资源在线资源免费观看 ,人妻少妇精品视频二区,极度sm残忍bdsm变态

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Chinese Perspectives

Analyzing the illegality and invalidity of the South China Sea Arbitration Awards via six 'whys'

Keynote Speech at the Symposium on "South China Sea Arbitration Awards and International Law"

By Ma Xinmin | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2024-04-30 09:34
Share
Share - WeChat

II. Why is it argued that the arbitral tribunal contravened the law?

The arbitral tribunal disregarded the rules of international law and rendered unlawful decisions, seriously undermining the international rule of law. This is chiefly manifested in six aspects:

First, the arbitral tribunal disregarded the fact that general international law can serve as the legal basis for maritime claims. The preamble of the Convention explicitly states that "matters not regulated by the Convention continue to be governed by the rules and principles of general international law."

Second, the arbitral tribunal disregarded the relationship between the Convention and general international law as outlined in the Convention itself. Although the arbitral tribunal cited Articles 311 and 293 of the Convention to argue that the Convention takes precedence over rules of general international law, Article 311 solely addresses the relationship between the Convention and other treaties, while Article 293 concerns the application of law, neither addressing the Convention's relationship with general international law.

Third, the arbitral tribunal disregarded the well-established rules pertaining to historic rights in general international law.

Fourth, the arbitral tribunal disregarded the long-established régime of continental States' outlying archipelagos in general international law.

Fifth, the arbitral tribunal disregarded the explicit provisions of Article 121 of the Convention and manipulated its wording.

Sixth, the arbitral tribunal disregarded due process and the rule of evidence, such as acting contrary to basic burden of proof requirements, deliberately lowering the standard of proof for the Philippines, making determinations based upon irrelevant, immaterial, or non-probative evidence, and making subjective assumptions about the facts.

|<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next   >>|
Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 宁乡县| 双鸭山市| 策勒县| 北海市| 乐都县| 宝坻区| 清流县| 德昌县| 甘泉县| 明光市| 嘉义县| 观塘区| 车险| 西宁市| 铜梁县| 苍溪县| 广宁县| 灵宝市| 连云港市| 永嘉县| 东乌| 昌吉市| 剑阁县| 鸡西市| 道真| 连州市| 双鸭山市| 福州市| 尼勒克县| 修水县| 永靖县| 偃师市| 江源县| 黄龙县| 舒兰市| 荔波县| 凤台县| 庆阳市| 招远市| 延边| 徐州市|