男友太凶猛1v1高h,大地资源在线资源免费观看 ,人妻少妇精品视频二区,极度sm残忍bdsm变态

Apple and Proview court controversy at iPad hearing

Updated: 2012-02-23 10:20

By Wu Yiyao and Tang Yue (China Daily)

  Comments() Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

 Apple and Proview court controversy at iPad hearing

Lawyer Ma Dongxiao, representing Shenzhen-based Proview Technology in a trademark dispute with Apple Inc, is surrounded by journalists outside a court in Shanghai on Wednesday. [Photo/China Daily]

 Apple and Proview court controversy at iPad hearing

Han Ziwen, a proud Apple customer, displays his newly purchased iPads outside the US tech firm's flagship store in Beijing on Sept 17, 2010. Like many others, Han had lined up outside the store for 60 hours to be one of the first to buy an iPad in China. However, the product could be pulled from the shelves if Apple loses its trademark dispute with Shenzhen Proview Technology. [Photo/AFP]

Apple and Proview court controversy at iPad hearing

Heated exchanges in trademark dispute, report Wu Yiyao in Shanghai and Tang Yue in Beijing.

Attorneys for Shenzhen Proview Technology and Apple went head-to-head on Wednesday during a heated hearing in Shanghai over the bitter iPad trademark dispute.

The first session was adjourned after four hours, during which Proview denied having sold the right to use the iPad trademark to Apple, while the US tech giant rejected calls for a sales ban on its tablet computers.

Lawyers for the plaintiff and defendant were repeatedly admonished by the presiding judge and told to respect court protocol during arguments. No date was set for a verdict or second hearing.

At the heart of the dispute is the sale of the trademark by Proview's Taiwan affiliate to an Apple subsidiary in 2009.

Xie Xianghui, representing the Shenzhen LCD maker, argued that the transfer was invalid, as it was incomplete. In evidence, Proview presented its IPAD - Internet Personal Access Device - to show it was the first to register the trademark and produce a product.

Apple's use of the iPad name has also made it hard for the Chinese company to sell the trademark, such as to Chinese phone makers and PC maker, Xie said, adding that this means Proview may be unable to repay its bank debts.

However, Hu Jinnan, Apple's attorney, countered that Proview has not marketed or sold its IPAD for years, thus potentially invalidating its claim to the trademark.

The US tech firm also presented copies of e-mails as evidence that Proview was aware of the trademark sale and that the parent company was involved during the process.

A sales ban of the iPad in China will affect a large group, including consumers, added Hu.

Xie dismissed the argument and added that a block on the use of the trademark was unlikely to hurt Apple's profit margins.

Just 50 people were admitted into the gallery to watch the proceedings, which have attracted worldwide attention and thrown a spotlight on trademark disputes in China.

Shu Jianxin, an intellectual property attorney in Shanghai who has been following the case closely, said that if Proview is successful, Apple's tablet computers could be pulled from shelves within 48 hours.

   Previous Page 1 2 3 Next Page  

主站蜘蛛池模板: 德昌县| 长寿区| 突泉县| 涿州市| 岳阳县| 从江县| 敦化市| 玛曲县| 开原市| 苍山县| 内乡县| 双峰县| 思南县| 修文县| 施秉县| 内黄县| 张家界市| 阳谷县| 获嘉县| 嘉善县| 定州市| 镶黄旗| 永善县| 大方县| 肥城市| 台州市| 赤城县| 吴桥县| 金川县| 随州市| 修武县| 连山| 九龙坡区| 肇州县| 兰坪| 永德县| 牙克石市| 延川县| 嘉祥县| 榕江县| 涞源县|