男友太凶猛1v1高h,大地资源在线资源免费观看 ,人妻少妇精品视频二区,极度sm残忍bdsm变态

   
  home feedback about us  
   
CHINAGATE.OPINION.Education&HR    
Agriculture  
Education&HR  
Energy  
Environment  
Finance  
Legislation  
Macro economy  
Population  
Private economy  
SOEs  
Sci-Tech  
Social security  
Telecom  
Trade  
Transportation  
Rural development  
Urban development  
     
     
 
 
Education not a cheap suit


2006-03-14
China Daily

Education is a public good, not a business, says a commentary on thewww.rednet.com.cn. An excerpt follows:

When asked by a member of the 10th National Committee of the CPPCC why more and more students from poverty-stricken families cannot afford college education, the spokesperson of the Ministry of Education answered that non-compulsory education has become a market product, and students and their families should buy what they can afford.

The spokesperson even drew an analogy to explain that rich people may buy a 10,000 yuan (US$1,200) suit while some people cannot afford to buy one valued at 100 yuan.

Buying a suit is market behaviour regulated according to our capability. Yet according to his statement, schools are like shops selling educational resources. Such an explanation is truly depressing.

It is a gloomy fact that high fees for non-compulsory education are a burden for many families. Though it has been made clear that compulsory education is a public product that should be provided by the government, the above statement by the spokesperson shows that our educational authorities are treating non-compulsory education as a sheer market product.

Making education a business is actually a denial of their mission. A clothes shop has no responsibility to dress the whole population well, but educational institutions should shoulder the responsibility of cultivating talent for our nation.

Parents are trying their hardest to see that their children achieve good education, so that the children can enjoy higher living standards. This is the social value of education. If the spokesperson says people should treat education just like a suit, does that mean they should accept poverty as something hereditary that they cannot take off?

The use of the "education as clothing" analogy is the acknowledgment of educational industrialization. This goes against the goal of education reform, which seeks to reverse business and restore education as a public good.

 
 
     
  print  
     
  go to forum  
     
     
 
home feedback about us  
  Produced by www.sdlsmy.com. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@chinagate.com.cn
主站蜘蛛池模板: 平远县| 延长县| 大渡口区| 保靖县| 乾安县| 梁河县| 镇雄县| 阿合奇县| 即墨市| 澄江县| 二手房| 霸州市| 蛟河市| 德庆县| 龙山县| 富裕县| 乌拉特中旗| 宝丰县| 古田县| 肇东市| 鄂伦春自治旗| 禹州市| 明光市| 延吉市| 积石山| 科尔| 本溪| 安阳县| 家居| 利川市| 资溪县| 涞源县| 清水县| 巴南区| 平潭县| 正镶白旗| 新竹市| 盐边县| 客服| 马尔康县| 玉林市|