男友太凶猛1v1高h,大地资源在线资源免费观看 ,人妻少妇精品视频二区,极度sm残忍bdsm变态

   
  home feedback about us  
   
CHINAGATE.OPINION.Macro economy    
Agriculture  
Education&HR  
Energy  
Environment  
Finance  
Legislation  
Macro economy  
Population  
Private economy  
SOEs  
Sci-Tech  
Social security  
Telecom  
Trade  
Transportation  
Rural development  
Urban development  
     
     
 
 
Don't protect monopolies


2006-08-01
China Daily

Administrative protection has indulged monopoly industries, says a signed article in China Economic Times. An excerpt follows:

China's airlines lost a total of 430 million yuan (US$54 million) in the second quarter as soaring oil prices pushed up costs, said the country's aviation regulator. The industry suffered an aggregate loss of 2.57 billion yuan (US$321 million) in the first half of this year, more than quadruple that in the same period last year. Companies have to cope with soaring oil prices and fierce competition. As a result, airlines have once again called for an increase in the fuel surcharge as a way to get out of the red.

The more aid they get, the more money they lose. This seems to have been a common problem in all monopoly industries in recent years.

The National Development and Reform Commission raised power prices in order to subsidize the loss-making power industry. Meanwhile, a number of banks started to collect various kinds of fees in order to turn losses into profits. While oil companies enjoy trillions of yuan in profits, they also receive State subsidies worth tens of billion of yuan.

"Having a loss" has become the most frequently used phrase for monopoly industries. It has also become the best way for them to ask for subsidies from the government.

We all know that monopoly brings about fat profits. But the country's monopoly industries have been talking about serious losses. Different from other industries that are marketized, monopoly industries have extremely high behind-the-scenes personnel, administration and hospitality costs, which are much higher than their marketing, quality control and after-sales service costs. Once their profit figure changes, they think little about reducing these backstage costs or improving efficiency and attracting more clients. Instead, they take their begging bowl to the government.

And related authorities repeatedly indulge these monopoly industries. To keep the airlines happy, the General Administration of Civil Aviation of China let the fuel surcharge make a comeback. This approaches the customers' bottom line but still cannot satisfy airlines' greedy appetite.

With administrative protection, airlines remain content with standing still. Their imperiousness can be seen from their arrogant attitudes in dealing with disputes caused by delayed flights. If the airlines continue destroying their own image, they will lose more customers and the ability to cope with fuel price fluctuation in the international market and finally make a real loss.

Monopolies not only harm the sectors they operate in, they also lead to market unfairness. Monopoly enterprises not only oppress customers but also excessively depend on government to maintain their profits. Government protection fosters their greed and harms the country's overall economic development.

 
 
     
  print  
     
  go to forum  
     
     
 
home feedback about us  
  Produced by www.sdlsmy.com. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@chinagate.com.cn
主站蜘蛛池模板: 平泉县| 昭苏县| 康乐县| 老河口市| 洱源县| 泊头市| 静乐县| 綦江县| 依安县| 九寨沟县| 凭祥市| 个旧市| 乐陵市| 定边县| 大同县| 瑞丽市| 长葛市| 伊川县| 天全县| 白朗县| 陵水| 白沙| 霍山县| 巴东县| 兴国县| 琼结县| 黔南| 西和县| 平度市| 拉萨市| 平塘县| 菏泽市| 凌云县| 常熟市| 静宁县| 林州市| 祁阳县| 启东市| 理塘县| 玉环县| 井陉县|