男友太凶猛1v1高h,大地资源在线资源免费观看 ,人妻少妇精品视频二区,极度sm残忍bdsm变态

 
  | Home | News| Living in China| SMS | About us | Contact us|
   
 Language Tips > 2002
Updated: 2002-10-22 01:00

Proof of Jesus-Burial Artifact May Be the Oldest Evidence of Christ (2002/10/23)
古老墓志銘現(xiàn)身以色列 為世人講述耶穌的來(lái)歷 (2002/10/23)
An empty ossuary, or limestone burial box for bones is seen with an inscription in Aramaic reading ' ``James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus.''

An inscription on a burial artifact that was recently discovered in Israel appears to provide the oldest archaeological evidence of Jesus Christ, according to an expert who dates it to three decades after the rucifixion.

Writing in Biblical Archaeology Review, Andre Lemaire, a specialist in ancient inscriptions, says it is very probable the find is an authentic reference to Jesus of Nazareth.

That Jesus existed is not doubted by scholars, but what the world knows about him comes almost entirely from the New Testament. No physical artifact from the first century related to Jesus has been discovered and verified. Lemaire believes that has changed, though questions remain, such as where the piece with the inscription has been for more than 19 centuries.

The inscription, in the Aramaic language, appears on an empty ossuary, or limestone burial box for bones. It reads: "James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus." Lemaire dates the object to 63 A.D.

Lemaire says the writing style, and the fact that Jews practiced ossuary burials only between 20 B.C. and A.D. 70, puts the inscription squarely in the time of Jesus and James, who led the early church in Jerusalem.

All three names were commonplace, but he estimates that only 20 Jameses in Jerusalem during that era would have had a father named Joseph and a brother named Jesus.

Moreover, naming the brother as well as the father on an ossuary was "very unusual," Lemaire says. There's only one other known example in Aramaic. Thus, this particular Jesus must have had some unusual role or fame - and Jesus of Nazareth certainly qualified, Lemaire concludes.

It's impossible, however, to prove absolutely that the Jesus named on the box was Jesus of Nazareth.

(Agencies)

近日,在以色列出土的一件陪葬品上的墓志銘有可能成為迄今年代最久遠(yuǎn)的能夠證實(shí)耶酥基督存在的考古證據(jù)。專(zhuān)家鑒定,該陪葬品的年代應(yīng)該是在耶酥殉難后的三十年。

對(duì)此,古代墓志銘專(zhuān)家安德烈·勒邁里在《圣經(jīng)考古學(xué)評(píng)論》期刊中寫(xiě)道,這些墓志銘極有可能成為拿撒勒人耶穌存在的可信證據(jù)。

盡管對(duì)于學(xué)者來(lái)說(shuō),耶酥的存在從來(lái)就是不爭(zhēng)的事實(shí),但關(guān)于他的一切人們都只能從《新約》中獲知。在這之前,從來(lái)沒(méi)有發(fā)現(xiàn)任何從第一世紀(jì)留存下來(lái)的與耶酥存在有關(guān)的物品。勒邁里認(rèn)為現(xiàn)在這一墓志銘的發(fā)現(xiàn)能夠說(shuō)明一些問(wèn)題,盡管還有部分謎團(tuán)未解。例如在過(guò)去的19個(gè)世紀(jì)中這份墓志銘究竟存在于何處等。

這份墓志銘寫(xiě)在一個(gè)空的存放尸骨的石灰石盒子上,上面用亞拉姆語(yǔ)寫(xiě)道:"詹姆士,約瑟夫之子,耶酥之兄。"勒邁里判斷該墓志銘的年代為公元63年。

勒邁里說(shuō),公元前20年到公元70年之間,猶太人慣于用石灰石盒子盛放尸骨,而從該墓志銘的寫(xiě)作風(fēng)格來(lái)判斷,該墓志銘所指的就應(yīng)該是當(dāng)時(shí)在耶路撒冷領(lǐng)導(dǎo)早期教堂的耶酥和詹姆士兄弟。

盡管墓志銘中提到的三個(gè)名字在當(dāng)時(shí)都很普遍,但勒邁里估計(jì)說(shuō)當(dāng)時(shí)的耶路撒冷最多只有20個(gè)詹姆士有叫約瑟夫的父親和耶酥的兄弟。

而且,據(jù)勒邁里說(shuō),在墓志銘中同時(shí)提及兄弟和父親的名字顯得"很不尋常"。目前已知的在亞拉姆語(yǔ)中僅有一例。因此,勒邁里認(rèn)為有理由相信這個(gè)"耶酥"一定有非同尋常的身份地位--而拿撒勒人耶穌就剛好具備這個(gè)條件。

盡管如此,科學(xué)家們?nèi)匀徽也怀鋈魏巫銐虺渥愕淖C據(jù),來(lái)證明墓志銘中所說(shuō)的"耶酥"就是拿撒勒人耶穌。

注:拿撒勒(Nazareth):西南亞巴勒斯坦地區(qū)北部古城

(中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)網(wǎng)站譯)

 
Go to Other Sections
Related Stories
· Olympic spirit dampens among world's advertisers
雅典奧運(yùn)開(kāi)幕在即 世界各地廣告商熱情衰退
· Little Prince author remembered 60 years after disappearance
60年前神秘失蹤 《小王子》作者令人懷念
· The hidden pleasures of Athens
雅典——一座隱藏著快樂(lè)的城市
more
 
Copyright by chinadaily.com.cn. All rights reserved

版權(quán)聲明:未經(jīng)中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)網(wǎng)站許可,任何人不得復(fù)制本欄目?jī)?nèi)容。如需轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)與本網(wǎng)站聯(lián)系。
None of this material may be used for any commercial or public use. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
 

 

主站蜘蛛池模板: 青铜峡市| 新闻| 绥阳县| 云阳县| 台中市| 连云港市| 玛沁县| 万荣县| 湖州市| 全南县| 确山县| 广水市| 海兴县| 依兰县| 万全县| 威海市| 谷城县| 枣庄市| 临猗县| 双桥区| 枣强县| 西平县| 宣恩县| 鸡东县| 大渡口区| 怀远县| 栾川县| 林西县| 离岛区| 马尔康县| 桑植县| 乳山市| 清原| 灵山县| 怀远县| 奎屯市| 吉安市| 加查县| 吉木萨尔县| 千阳县| 崇礼县|