男友太凶猛1v1高h,大地资源在线资源免费观看 ,人妻少妇精品视频二区,极度sm残忍bdsm变态

We have launched E-mail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
 
You Are Here: Home > Publications> Articles

Conflicts in Rural Governance

2015-12-02

By Zhao Shukai, Development Research Center of the State Council

Over the past ten years and more since the turn of the new century, China's rural development has kept a sound momentum, with farmers' income increased rapidly, public product supply enriched, and rural residents' wellbeing remarkably improved. However, with regard to governance, rapid development has not brought sound governance, or if we could say, the governance quality has failed to rise to an extent compatible with economic and social development; governance quality is instead worsened in many aspects. The author holds that such phenomenon of "strong development but weak governance" has not only puzzled the public in understanding China's development, but also intensified social anxiety and unrest, thus leading to public puzzle over China's future performance. According to the author, this is mainly reflected as follows: first, development and governance are imbalanced. Currently, unsound performance in rural governance is mainly, viewing from the social perspective, demonstrated through intensified rural social conflicts and increased complaints by farmers against township government. As regards the government, the relationship between different levels of government has become rather tense, with less trust between various levels of governments as well as inadequate cooperation among them. Second, there is an intrinsic logical conflict with the system. The way to find out the reason for the occurrence and evolvement of China's social conflicts should focus on the government system itself. And third, system conflicts are chiefly reflected in the following four aspects: the system conflict relating to budget management, the system conflict concerning official management, the system conflict pertinent to government performance and accountability, and the system conflict between township government and primary-level self-governance.

 
For more detailed information, please refer to here.

 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 贺兰县| 黎平县| 剑阁县| 景德镇市| 西和县| 阿瓦提县| 洪洞县| 尼玛县| 汝阳县| 沿河| 临颍县| 社旗县| 夏邑县| 德惠市| 庆安县| 集安市| 宁都县| 松溪县| 公安县| 余干县| 无为县| 海盐县| 明水县| 略阳县| 咸阳市| 高州市| 苗栗县| 龙门县| 苏尼特左旗| 忻城县| 珲春市| 洛浦县| 宜城市| 盘山县| 云阳县| 胶州市| 绥中县| 滨海县| 贵南县| 沂南县| 南京市|