男友太凶猛1v1高h,大地资源在线资源免费观看 ,人妻少妇精品视频二区,极度sm残忍bdsm变态

We have launched E-mail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
 
You Are Here: Home > Publications> Articles

On Fragmentation of Community-level Government Operation Mechanism

2016-01-04

Zhao Shukai, Development Research Center of the State Council

Operation of community-level government has now entered a “locked” state and formed a specific vicious path-dependence, with internal institutional innovation difficult to emerge. The so-called “fragmentation” operation bears at least meanings in two aspects: first, it is manifested as a region divided into areas by several standards such as by residence of poor population, which has led to regional fragmentation governance. Second, it refers to fragmentation of local governments with their large numbers of departments, overlapped functions and blurred division of responsibilities, making it hard to land public issues onto effective administrative bodies. “Fragmentation” seems to be in conflict with “campaign-based operation”, but proves to be a key feature of local governments’ inappropriate institutionalization. Precisely, it should be called campaign-based operation in form and fragmentation operation in essence, which is mainly reflected as follows: first, fragmentation of “values”; second, fragmentation of “systems”; and third, fragmentation of “government functions”. Government behavior and interactions between government and the public are regulated with inadequate systems in a contingent and random manner, presenting a fragmented governing structure. The “fragmented” government operation system is also manifested in the fragmentation of the budget system. In such fragmented operation, community-level governments have to some extent become an independent political entity of interest, most extremely reflected in the fact that some community-level governments are neither community-level governments under the central government nor governments on behalf of the local people, but merely those of local officials. Community-level organizations are usually efficient in operation, but this efficiency is highly destructive, which means that they can both swiftly implement those self-profit policies and dissolve policies that benefit the country and people rather than themselves. To this, people cannot help lamenting that “policies would not go beyond the central government”.

 
 
For more detailed information, please refer to here.

 

 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 萨迦县| 黄大仙区| 连州市| 邢台市| 大足县| 西贡区| 桂平市| 海林市| 桦甸市| 榆社县| 东乡族自治县| 涪陵区| 武山县| 宜川县| 泰顺县| 石屏县| 辽阳市| 阿瓦提县| 循化| 岗巴县| 涟源市| 德安县| 库车县| 遵义市| 青冈县| 四子王旗| 朝阳县| 云梦县| 保康县| 鹤壁市| 台北县| 吴桥县| 嘉荫县| 新沂市| 子洲县| 南乐县| 肥城市| 海安县| 乌海市| 马公市| 开鲁县|