男友太凶猛1v1高h,大地资源在线资源免费观看 ,人妻少妇精品视频二区,极度sm残忍bdsm变态

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

Prohibiting taxi drivers from driving out of town is unreasonable

chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2013-01-29 22:18

Local authorities should not solve livelihood problems at the expense of taxi drivers' legal rights, according to an article in Beijing Youth Daily. Excerpts:

As Spring Festival approaches, Guangzhou and Zhenjiang governments have launched a new policy to alleviate the taxi shortage in their cities during Spring Festival.

Local authorities may have good intentions, but the method they have adopted is too arbitrary and unreasonable. In Guangzhou and Zhenjiang, taxi drivers sign leasing contracts with taxi companies and pay them rental fees monthly. Within the leasing period, taxi drivers have the right to operate independently. Such contracts are protected by law.

But local authorities arbitrarily intervene in taxi drivers' operations through administrative means. Guangzhou authorities have stipulated that if taxi drivers take taxes out of town, their contracts with the taxi companies will be terminated.

Local authorities intervene in taxi drivers' operations through administrative means that have no legal basis. This is an example of how administrative power tramples citizens' legal rights arbitrarily. The new policy that seems benefits local citizens is actually at the cost of violating taxi drivers' rights.

There are many other ways to ease the taxi shortage in local cities without trampling the rights of taxi drivers who come from other areas, such as providing free bus transportation during Spring Festival and encouraging citizens to use public transportation. Or the authorities could pay the rental fee during Spring Festival for taxi drivers, in order to encourage drivers from other areas to stay in the cities during the holiday. Whatever method local authorities adopt, it should not be at the cost of taxi drivers' legal rights. Administrative power should not go against the law, otherwise it will face criticism similar to the backlash that Guangzhou and Zhenjiang authorities have experienced.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 郯城县| 色达县| 伊宁县| 耿马| 怀远县| 米泉市| 临漳县| 如皋市| 梧州市| 溆浦县| 湘阴县| 开封市| 睢宁县| 京山县| 黎川县| 改则县| 大英县| 射阳县| 克拉玛依市| 衡阳市| 诸暨市| 游戏| 双峰县| 乌拉特中旗| 乐平市| 城口县| 芦溪县| 揭西县| 安庆市| 江津市| 宣化县| 定日县| 翼城县| 依安县| 巴东县| 苗栗县| 吴江市| 封丘县| 芒康县| 多伦县| 道真|