男友太凶猛1v1高h,大地资源在线资源免费观看 ,人妻少妇精品视频二区,极度sm残忍bdsm变态

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

Counties may be incorrectly labeled as poverty stricken

chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2013-02-27 20:18

Datong county’s return to the ranks of poverty county after 16 years, shows that related authorities haven’t followed the criteria and standard by which poverty counties should be judged, says an article on China Youth Daily. Excerpts:

In 1996, Datong county in Shanxi province was judged to be a comparatively well-off county. But Datong’s financial income in that year was only 37.4 million yuan ($600 million), while expenditure was as high as 65.9 million yuan. Datong local authority couldn’t make ends meet at that time and didn’t achieve the 16 principles that determine a comparatively well-off county.

It’s was simply the hopes and endeavors of local authorities’ that led to Datong being judged to be a comparatively well-off county.

In January this year, Datong was labeled a national poverty county — again thanks to the efforts of local officials.

It makes the public doubt whether counties labeled as being comparatively well-off or poverty stricken, or the metropolises labeled as clean or livable cities, really deserve their name.

If a county is really poor and needs help it should be regarded as a poverty county once local authorities report the real situation. But according to Wang Hanbin, chief of Datong poverty alleviation and development office, it’s difficult to get the document that will classify Datong as a national poverty county. There are many human factors that influence if a county is poor. A widespread joke goes: A head of a county said his area isn’t regarded as a poverty county because they are too poor.

The label of comparatively well-off or poverty can be unduly influenced by the individuals in the counties who want a certain label because it could benefit them. Liang Shubin, former headmaster of Datong county party school, said it’s difficult for them to get funds or financial aid if they have the label comparatively well-off county.

Datong’s case exposes how authorities do not strictly implement policy determining the areas rankings according to criteria and standards.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 榆中县| 许昌市| 萨迦县| 阿瓦提县| 蓝山县| 邯郸市| 武邑县| 潼关县| 崇阳县| 凯里市| 华池县| 宜良县| 富平县| 个旧市| 鄂尔多斯市| 尼玛县| 怀化市| 娱乐| 陇南市| 东山县| 万载县| 扶余县| 石河子市| 自贡市| 万安县| 柳河县| 洛浦县| 上虞市| 新河县| 五峰| 高密市| 东乡| 分宜县| 会泽县| 星座| 长垣县| 岱山县| 乌什县| 房山区| 长武县| 当涂县|