男友太凶猛1v1高h,大地资源在线资源免费观看 ,人妻少妇精品视频二区,极度sm残忍bdsm变态

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Editorials

Disclosure of collections

China Daily | Updated: 2013-09-05 07:45

How much has been levied in fees on those who have violated the family planning policy and where has the money gone?

With the National Audit Office saying that it has not paid due attention to the auditing of this money because of the pressure of a tight work schedule, it seems that it will take some time before the total amount accrued and the details about its spending are revealed to the public.

When a lawyer from East China's Zhejiang province asked the family planning departments of 31 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities in July how much they had collected in fees in 2012 and how the money had been spent, 17 of them released their figures. On Sept 1, 14 lawyers followed up by applying to the National Audit Office for detailed auditing information about these fees.

The public has been kept in the dark about the amount of money collected from such penalties and where the money goes, as the government has never revealed any details.

An official from the National Health and Family Planning Commission on Tuesday couched in vague language that the money is spent as it should be. He also said that for many years the fees have been handed over to the national coffers.

It is five years since the regulations about government information disclosure took effect. In accordance with the regulations, there is no reason why the central and local governments are still not disclosing information about the fees to the public.

Keeping the public in the dark about the total amount raised and how much has been spent on what, will only lead to suspicions of mismanagement or abuse.

It is the obligation of the family planning departments to give a detailed account of the money they collect from such fees.

The family planning authorities at both central and local levels may consider the disclosure of this information an imposition or irritation. But it serves as a reminder to both the general public and the government that a lot of money is raised from these penalties and the family planning departments should be held accountable for it.

(China Daily 09/05/2013 page8)

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 三门县| 奉新县| 邛崃市| 福州市| 芦山县| 台山市| 洛隆县| 中卫市| 徐汇区| 莱阳市| 济阳县| 项城市| 沈丘县| 开封市| 上栗县| 泰宁县| 孟连| 洛南县| 同心县| 浠水县| 贺兰县| 横山县| 荥经县| 崇义县| 鄯善县| 光山县| 天津市| 凉城县| 荃湾区| 宁南县| 文登市| 新巴尔虎右旗| 永德县| 宁陵县| 涟源市| 金湖县| 措勤县| 屏南县| 宽城| 来宾市| 固安县|